<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Kearney &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Apple support will not support users who have malware installed impersonating an Apple AV for Mac</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/05/apple-support-will-not-support-users-who-have-malware-installed-impersonating-an-apple-av-for-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/05/apple-support-will-not-support-users-who-have-malware-installed-impersonating-an-apple-av-for-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kearney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/05/apple-support-will-not-support-users-who-have-malware-installed-impersonating-an-apple-av-for-mac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tumblog/images/">Images</a></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/t7f66.png" title="image" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://blog.ryankearney.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/t7f66.png" alt="image" width="528" /></a></p><p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/05/apple-support-will-not-support-users-who-have-malware-installed-impersonating-an-apple-av-for-mac/">Apple support will not support users who have malware installed impersonating an Apple AV for Mac</a></p><p>I guess that&#8217;s one way to deal with Viruses on OSX. Apple just ignores them all together.</p></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com">Ryan Kearney</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/05/apple-support-will-not-support-users-who-have-malware-installed-impersonating-an-apple-av-for-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free &amp; Better Alternatives To MobileMe</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/03/free-better-alternatives-to-mobileme/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/03/free-better-alternatives-to-mobileme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kearney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DropBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MobileMe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryankearney.com/?p=2560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tumblog/articles/">Articles</a></p><p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/03/free-better-alternatives-to-mobileme/">Free &#038; Better Alternatives To MobileMe</a></p><p>MobileMe is Apple's attempt to help users keep their data in sync. However, there is one problem with MobileMe: It costs $99 a year. While many users may be able to justify spending $99 a year to keep their data synced between their devices, others may find it outrageous and, as it turns out, there are free alternatives.</p></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com">Ryan Kearney</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2011/03/free-better-alternatives-to-mobileme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Apple Approved Opera And Not Google Voice</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/04/why-apple-approved-opera-and-not-google-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/04/why-apple-approved-opera-and-not-google-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kearney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryankearney.com/?p=1891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tumblog/quotes/">Quotes</a></p><p><cite>Ryan,

<p>I've asked my colleagues who deal with Apple if they knew why Opera was approved while Google Voice was rejected.

<p>I've discovered that some of the higher-ups at AT&T did have a high amount of influence on the two applications being accepted and rejected.

<p>AT&T decided to reject Google Voice due to the fact that users would have no reason to keep their texting plan since they would be able to send/receive all their text messages through the Google Voice app which would make use of their data plan. This would cost AT&T to lose $20/month per user who got rid of their texting plan.

<p>Opera Mini, on the other hand, compresses web pages before they are sent to the device as a way to speed up their web browsing experience on slower networks (EDGE). Because Opera compresses the web page before it is sent to the device, it results in less data transfer on the device. This would result in AT&T saving money by charging users the same amount every month for using less data.

<p>I hope this has cleared some things up. ~ <a href="http://" title="Why Apple Approved Opera And Not Google Voice">Anonymous</a></cite></p><p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/04/why-apple-approved-opera-and-not-google-voice/">Why Apple Approved Opera And Not Google Voice</a></p><p>Ever since Opera for the iPhone was released, I asked myself over and over, why did Apple approve Opera and not Google Voice?

Well today, I finally got my answer. The following statement was emailed to me from a friend and employee who works for AT&#038;T.</p></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com">Ryan Kearney</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/04/why-apple-approved-opera-and-not-google-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad vs HP Mini Netbook</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/ipad-vs-hp-mini-netbook/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/ipad-vs-hp-mini-netbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kearney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HP Mini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryankearney.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tumblog/articles/">Articles</a></p><p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/ipad-vs-hp-mini-netbook/">iPad vs HP Mini Netbook</a></p><p>When you compare, there&#8217;s no comparison - AT&#38;T Ultimatrix pointed out where Steve Jobs compared the iPad to a Netbook, so you can stop posting comments about comparing two completely different devices. Skip to 1:30 The problem is, Netbooks aren&#8217;t better at anything - Steve Jobs Well Steve, let&#8217;s see what the Netbook is better [...]</p></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com">Ryan Kearney</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/ipad-vs-hp-mini-netbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>293</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Hand Look At iPad Web Browsing Experience</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/first-hand-look-at-ipad-web-browsing-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/first-hand-look-at-ipad-web-browsing-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Kearney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryankearney.com/?p=1303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted in <a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/tumblog/images/">Images</a></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ipad-web-browsing.jpg" title="image" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://blog.ryankearney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ipad-web-browsing.jpg" alt="image" width="528" /></a></p><p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/first-hand-look-at-ipad-web-browsing-experience/">First Hand Look At iPad Web Browsing Experience</a></p><p>The Flash Blog posted pictures of the ultimate browsing experience on the iPad.</p></p><p><a href="http://blog.ryankearney.com">Ryan Kearney</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ryankearney.com/2010/01/first-hand-look-at-ipad-web-browsing-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

